java - How to delete a file on google drive using Google Drive Android API -


i'm new google drive android api, , i'm learning it. encountered problem cannot delete file using google drive android api, there isn't example of it. can anybood me question? alot.

update (april 2015)
gdaa has it's own 'trash' functionality rendering answer below irrelevant.

original answer:
cheryl mentioned above, can combine these 2 apis.

the following code snippet, taken here, shows how can done:

first, gain access both googleapiclient, , ...services.drive.drive

googleapiclient _gac; com.google.api.services.drive.drive _drvsvc;  public void init(mainactivity ctx, string email){   // build gdaa  googleapiclient   _gac = new googleapiclient.builder(ctx).addapi(com.google.android.gms.drive.drive.api)         .addscope(com.google.android.gms.drive.drive.scope_file).setaccountname(email)         .addconnectioncallbacks(ctx).addonconnectionfailedlistener(ctx).build();    // build restful (drivesdkv2) service fall delete   com.google.api.client.googleapis.extensions.android.gms.auth.googleaccountcredential crd =   googleaccountcredential     .usingoauth2(ctx, arrays.aslist(com.google.api.services.drive.drivescopes.drive_file));   crd.setselectedaccountname(email);   _drvsvc = new com.google.api.services.drive.drive.builder(           androidhttp.newcompatibletransport(), new gsonfactory(), crd).build(); }

second, implement restful api calls on gdaa's driveid: 

public void trash(driveid did) {   try {     string fileid =  did.getresourceid();       if (fileid != null)         _drvsvc.files().trash(fileid).execute();   } catch (exception e) {}  }  public void delete(driveid did) {   try {     string fileid = did.getresourceid();       if (fileid != null)         _drvsvc.files().delete(fileid).execute();   } catch (exception e) {}  }

... , voila, deleting files. , usual, not without problems.

first, if try delete file after created it, getresourceid() falls on it's face, returning null. not related issue here, i'm gonna raise nag on it.

and second, it hack! , should not stay in code past gdaa implementation of trash , delete functionality.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Android layout hidden on keyboard show -

i have strange problem layout. when tap on edittext , keyboard shown edittext stay on bottom , when tap on to hide keyboard , keyboard hides , edittext go should when want input text. when tap again, keyboard shown , edittext goes down behind keyboard... <relativelayout android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="match_parent" > <scrollview android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="fill_parent" android:above="@+id/rl_commands"> <textview android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content"/> </scrollview> <relativelayout android:layout_width="match_parent android:layout_height="24dp" android:id="@+id/rl_commands" android:alignparentbottom="true">
Read more

google app engine - 403 Forbidden POST - Flask WTForms -

i have flask application running on google app engine. trying submit form built using wtform , keep getting following error. 403 forbidden: don't have permission access requested resource. either read-protected or not readable server. location.html (part of code) <form method=post action="/home/location"> .... <button type="submit" class="btn btn-primary" value="submit"> directions </button> </form> main.py @app.route('/home/location', methods=['post', 'get']) def location(): form = cfcdirections.direction(request.form) print(request.method) if request.method == 'post' , form.validate(): print("after if") directions = cfcdirections() street_no = directions.no street = directions.street suburb = directions.suburb postcode = directions.postcode
Read more

c - Why would PK11_GenerateRandom() return an error -8023? -

i looking through internet trying find source of pk11_generaterandom() function see why function fail. have program uses function when moved new flavor of linux, fails after forking ( fork() ) since not believe there problem nss, suspect doing incorrectly disregarded in older versions of linux new 1 there issue. the openssl package same on 'good' , 'bad' server: openssl 0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 01 jul nss rpm differs though. 'good' has nss-3.12.2.0-2.el5 and bas has version nss-3.15.3-4.el5_10 the 'good' server uses quite obsolete linux: linux 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 smp wed jan 21 08:45:05 est 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 gnu/linux enterprise linux enterprise linux server release 5.3 (carthage) red hat enterprise linux server release 5.3 (tikanga) the 'bad' server newer: linux bad 2.6.18-371.4.1.el5 #1 smp wed jan 29 11:05:49 pst 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 gnu/linux oracle linux server release 5.10 red hat enterprise linux server release
Read more