linux - No SReclaimable in /proc/meminfo -


i using rh5.7 , cant find sreclaimable field. here output of cat /proc/meminfo, , yes there no sreclaimable.

memtotal:      8043128 kb memfree:         79524 kb buffers:        221152 kb cached:        3149268 kb swapcached:     446932 kb active:        5399580 kb inactive:      1101800 kb hightotal:           0 kb highfree:            0 kb lowtotal:      8043128 kb lowfree:         79524 kb swaptotal:    12289716 kb swapfree:     10996132 kb dirty:             396 kb writeback:           0 kb anonpages:     3128248 kb mapped:         374620 kb slab:          1097292 kb pagetables:      70952 kb nfs_unstable:        0 kb bounce:              0 kb commitlimit:  16311280 kb committed_as: 10445264 kb vmalloctotal: 34359738367 kb vmallocused:    329484 kb vmallocchunk: 34359407603 kb hugepages_total:     0 hugepages_free:      0 hugepages_rsvd:      0 hugepagesize:     2048 kb

i have linux box debian , can find field. had same issue?

here debian output :

cat /proc/meminfo memtotal:       16342296 kb memfree:        12461560 kb buffers:          275804 kb cached:          1900488 kb swapcached:            0 kb active:          2417824 kb inactive:        1073552 kb active(anon):    1320184 kb inactive(anon):   334456 kb active(file):    1097640 kb inactive(file):   739096 kb unevictable:        3768 kb mlocked:            3768 kb swaptotal:       4050940 kb swapfree:        4050940 kb dirty:               460 kb writeback:             0 kb anonpages:       1318932 kb mapped:           287776 kb shmem:            337092 kb slab:             216576 kb sreclaimable:     180840 kb sunreclaim:        35736 kb kernelstack:        4064 kb pagetables:        37656 kb nfs_unstable:          0 kb bounce:                0 kb writebacktmp:          0 kb commitlimit:    12222088 kb committed_as:    4796452 kb vmalloctotal:   34359738367 kb vmallocused:      566584 kb vmallocchunk:   34359167964 kb hardwarecorrupted:     0 kb anonhugepages:         0 kb hugepages_total:       0 hugepages_free:        0 hugepages_rsvd:        0 hugepages_surp:        0 hugepagesize:       2048 kb directmap4k:       66296 kb directmap2m:    16619520 kb


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Android layout hidden on keyboard show -

i have strange problem layout. when tap on edittext , keyboard shown edittext stay on bottom , when tap on to hide keyboard , keyboard hides , edittext go should when want input text. when tap again, keyboard shown , edittext goes down behind keyboard... <relativelayout android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="match_parent" > <scrollview android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="fill_parent" android:above="@+id/rl_commands"> <textview android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content"/> </scrollview> <relativelayout android:layout_width="match_parent android:layout_height="24dp" android:id="@+id/rl_commands" android:alignparentbottom="true">
Read more

google app engine - 403 Forbidden POST - Flask WTForms -

i have flask application running on google app engine. trying submit form built using wtform , keep getting following error. 403 forbidden: don't have permission access requested resource. either read-protected or not readable server. location.html (part of code) <form method=post action="/home/location"> .... <button type="submit" class="btn btn-primary" value="submit"> directions </button> </form> main.py @app.route('/home/location', methods=['post', 'get']) def location(): form = cfcdirections.direction(request.form) print(request.method) if request.method == 'post' , form.validate(): print("after if") directions = cfcdirections() street_no = directions.no street = directions.street suburb = directions.suburb postcode = directions.postcode
Read more

c - Why would PK11_GenerateRandom() return an error -8023? -

i looking through internet trying find source of pk11_generaterandom() function see why function fail. have program uses function when moved new flavor of linux, fails after forking ( fork() ) since not believe there problem nss, suspect doing incorrectly disregarded in older versions of linux new 1 there issue. the openssl package same on 'good' , 'bad' server: openssl 0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 01 jul nss rpm differs though. 'good' has nss-3.12.2.0-2.el5 and bas has version nss-3.15.3-4.el5_10 the 'good' server uses quite obsolete linux: linux 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 smp wed jan 21 08:45:05 est 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 gnu/linux enterprise linux enterprise linux server release 5.3 (carthage) red hat enterprise linux server release 5.3 (tikanga) the 'bad' server newer: linux bad 2.6.18-371.4.1.el5 #1 smp wed jan 29 11:05:49 pst 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 gnu/linux oracle linux server release 5.10 red hat enterprise linux server release
Read more