c# - Should I unit test a simple update app service? -


should unit testing app service simple 1 shown below?

public void update(useraccountviewmodel viewmodel)     {         var instance = mapper.map<useraccountviewmodel, useraccount>(viewmodel);         _useraccountservice.updateinstance(instance);     }

as can see takes in view model, uses automapper map domain model , calls domain service method update object. if should unit testing i'm struggling see unit test! perhaps answers own question argue there's nothing test other automapper's work believe should not unit testing anyway else's work right?

edit: replies. i've gone tests updateinstance method called once:

[testmethod] public void givenviewmodelwheneditingauserthentheupdateinstancedomainservicemethodiscalledonce() {     // arrange     _useraccounts.clear();     var viewmodel = new mock<useraccountviewmodel>();      // act     _useraccountappservice.update(viewmodel.object);      // assert     _useraccountservice.verify(e => e.updateinstance(it.isany<useraccount>()), times.once()); }

"what unit test" subjective question. answers range "nothing; it's waste of time" "always 100% code coverage." favor pragmatic unit testing. in case, update method little that, imo, it's not worth unit testing. you'd testing automapper, should tested creators.

unit testing real user account service's updateinstance method valuable, though.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Android layout hidden on keyboard show -

i have strange problem layout. when tap on edittext , keyboard shown edittext stay on bottom , when tap on to hide keyboard , keyboard hides , edittext go should when want input text. when tap again, keyboard shown , edittext goes down behind keyboard... <relativelayout android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="match_parent" > <scrollview android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="fill_parent" android:above="@+id/rl_commands"> <textview android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content"/> </scrollview> <relativelayout android:layout_width="match_parent android:layout_height="24dp" android:id="@+id/rl_commands" android:alignparentbottom="true">
Read more

google app engine - 403 Forbidden POST - Flask WTForms -

i have flask application running on google app engine. trying submit form built using wtform , keep getting following error. 403 forbidden: don't have permission access requested resource. either read-protected or not readable server. location.html (part of code) <form method=post action="/home/location"> .... <button type="submit" class="btn btn-primary" value="submit"> directions </button> </form> main.py @app.route('/home/location', methods=['post', 'get']) def location(): form = cfcdirections.direction(request.form) print(request.method) if request.method == 'post' , form.validate(): print("after if") directions = cfcdirections() street_no = directions.no street = directions.street suburb = directions.suburb postcode = directions.postcode
Read more

c - Why would PK11_GenerateRandom() return an error -8023? -

i looking through internet trying find source of pk11_generaterandom() function see why function fail. have program uses function when moved new flavor of linux, fails after forking ( fork() ) since not believe there problem nss, suspect doing incorrectly disregarded in older versions of linux new 1 there issue. the openssl package same on 'good' , 'bad' server: openssl 0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 01 jul nss rpm differs though. 'good' has nss-3.12.2.0-2.el5 and bas has version nss-3.15.3-4.el5_10 the 'good' server uses quite obsolete linux: linux 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 smp wed jan 21 08:45:05 est 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 gnu/linux enterprise linux enterprise linux server release 5.3 (carthage) red hat enterprise linux server release 5.3 (tikanga) the 'bad' server newer: linux bad 2.6.18-371.4.1.el5 #1 smp wed jan 29 11:05:49 pst 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 gnu/linux oracle linux server release 5.10 red hat enterprise linux server release
Read more